Stoned, For All Eternity
An awesome deal has been written about and made much of in alternative archaeology books about how and why our technologically primitive ancestors had been able to carve out, transport and erect massive multi-ton stone blocks into megalithic monuments of nicely, monumental measurement. The implication is that since there isn’t a doubting the existence of those constructions, our ancestors must of in reality possessed an advanced technology or had help from those that did (i.e. – ‘historical astronauts’). That runs opposite to the usual mannequin of scholarly archaeology. But the questions stay.
Maybe I might higher say what I imply by huge multi-ton stone blocks. I imply stones which might be at the least several tons in weight, as much as the most important identified carved (but still in-situ and unused) stone block weighing in at roughly 1250 tons. That is not the report however for there is, apparently, a stele base in China that weighs in at 16,250 tons. I imply these are stones that are not trivial to toss round, even at the moment. And while not all major continents and nations have megalithic stone monuments, like North America (USA & Canada) or Australia (including New Zealand) that nonetheless leaves loads of locations, and well known locations, that do.
How and why these megaliths had been constructed is not any trivial matter. For our ancestors to go to such lengths and expend such efforts, properly these stone monuments were obviously crucial to them, and it is essential to us to determine how and why they did it. Utilizing large stone blocks as an alternative of wood or even small stone blocks or bricks should have served a function despite the larger hardships involved. So, why did our ancient ancestors need giant stones; and how did they handle them
As to the why, presumably, for starters, for those who resolve to use stone, then it is essential enough a fabric serving a objective(s) that necessitates lasting for all practical functions an ‘eternity’. When you build one thing to final, a minimum of again then, you employ stone, the larger the higher. But for what objective did the ancients need such megalithic giants
Issues Arising: Objective
These historical societies or cultures spent an terrible lot of resources to construct issues that had been comparatively peripheral to their fundamental wants. The Easter Islanders might survive without those Moai statues; ancient Egypt would still have been a ‘superpower’ even without these pyramids, the Giza Sphinx, huge statues of some New Kingdom pharaohs (like Ramesses II – often called Ramesses the good), stele and obelisks. The Parthenon in Athens was just a shrine to one of the Greek deities (Athena), and comparable observations could possibly be extended to the hundreds of different monumental megalithic temples and monuments all over the world which had been primarily ceremonial in perform.
It’s difficult to figure out how Stonehenge contributed to the fundamental survival needs of the local population – you don’t need to assemble one thing of that magnitude just to let you know what season it’s! If it’s essential mark, say the Summer Solstice, all you need have is a historically and completely properly marked and simply recognized Level A, the place you may observe some mounted construction like a rock on the Horizon, that is Point B, and when the Sun arises directly over Level B, that is the longest day of the yr. There is not any want to have interaction in any sort of backbreaking toil or construction no matter.
If a society can afford to spend effort and time and cash on secondary initiatives, say like in trendy society various public artwork works compared to main projects like roads (transport), faculties (training) and hospitals (health care), then it’s a must to conclude that that society was nicely off on condition that they may divert primary sources from primary projects to undertake projects of a secondary nature. Both that, or that which appears to us as comparatively trivial or unimportant like Stonehenge or Carnac (Brittany, France) or those Easter Island statues or the Sphinx actually held a main function incomprehensible to us however which rivalled in significance housing and insuring ample meals provides and comparable issues important to their day-to-day survival.
Points Arising: Logistics
There’s also the logistics problem. You want a big workforce that needed to be fed and clothed and housed and cared for, particularly fed. There wasn’t exactly a nearby supermarket where infinite supplies may very well be purchased. Additional, while employed on these quarrying, transporting and building initiatives the employees could not be gainfully employed elsewhere to offer fundamentals like hunting and gathering for food or even tending to domesticated livestock and agricultural crops. The employees could not have been used for serving in the army, or another useful and obligatory task. All of this carving, transporting and building weren’t simply busy work designed to keep the rabble off the streets and out of bother, and slave labour wasn’t usually in vogue both, opposite to many standard Hollywood photos. In fact in the case of the Giza Sphinx, it was carved, however wasn’t transported, nor constructed per say. Nonetheless, the logistics in caving that massive stone statue from a rock outcrop would have been huge, and the rationale(s) for doing so of huge importance to the powers-that-be.
Issues Arising: Methods and Means: The How!
Although our focus and curiosity is commonly on the development phase, as in how was that finished, that is often only one-third of the exhausting yards. Take those 2.Three million blocks that make up the great Pyramid at Giza. Phase One: each block had to be carved to dimension. You simply didn’t hack out rocks at random and put them in place. That carving alone is tough yakka and helped keep up a state of full employment. Hard yakka Part Two was transporting those carved blocks from the assorted quarries – some native, some not – to motion city, the Giza Plateau. More full employment. The how in Section One and Two is not often all that mysterious – just bloody laborious backbreaking work. Anyway, again to the construction – Part Three.
To me the most important thriller will not be a lot how you get one thing from the horizontal to the vertical, like an obelisk, (that was demonstrated on the NOVA Television sequence “Secrets and techniques of Lost Empires”), but the way you get a large multi-ton stone block raised straight up, say 20 to 30 to 40 or extra ft to act as a lintel, like those at Stonehenge or on all those Greco-Roman and Egyptian temples, like say the Parthenon. One can all the time conceive of constructing sand or dirt ramps to haul huge lintels upwards into place, hence removing the sand or dirt after-the-truth, but if you happen to think about it, such infrastructure is a way more labour intensive and an all-round main mission in its personal proper. For example, constructing a sand ramp to haul those multi-ton stone blocks for the Giza pyramids would require a better quantity of fabric to be put into place (and naturally later removed) than that of the volume of fabric required to construct the pyramid in query in the first place. In fact if the undertaking is that important, and if there is just no other approach – properly there’s always these laborious options.
To illustrate for instance of just how bad our knowledge of our distant historic ancestors actually is, here’s a trilogy of extracts from classical scholar Nigel Rodgers in his text “The Historic Greek World: People and Places” (2010):
“[T]he Greeks relied on their intellectual powers and their remarkably skilled craftsmanship to erect their buildings. Few details survive of their precise constructing techniques, nevertheless.”
“Cranes had been nearly definitely used to help elevate the masonry up to the temples during development, although no traces of such machinery have been discovered.”
“How the Athenians assembled these temples, and indeed housed and fed the large, extremely expert workforce required to build them, so efficiently is unknown.”
So, now let’s look at options as provided in some alt-archaeological texts.
One theory sometimes seen in alt-archaeological tomes is that these massive blocks didn’t start out as massive blocks, just like a brick doesn’t start out as a brick, but slightly they had been poured into place, in a mould, like concrete or cement. Sorry, however modern petrologists’ may simply detect such. Often actually the quarry from the place the stone originated can be precisely recognized, although that always raises the query then of transport, for the reason that distances twixt quarry site and construction site can be a whole bunch of miles. That’s an issue that applies to Stonehenge in addition to some of the stonework for the Giza pyramids.
If you actually want to go far-out, star-scout, let’s attempt antigravity! Anti-gravity is only obtainable in one type, darkish power. Dark energy is that mysterious antigravity stone island full tracksuit sale power that’s causing the expanding Universe to keep on expanding at ever sooner and faster charges, in defiance of gravity which ought to slow the expansion rate down. Alas, dark vitality, which while dominant over the size of the whole Universe, is trivial domestically relative to Earth’s intense gravity discipline.
Alt-archaeology texts are stuffed with references to sound vitality that levitates (negates gravity) and thus massive blocks of stone might be floated round and put into place even with simply the oomph of an infant, just by making the appropriate sound at the suitable degree.. Sound after all could be targeted. Everyone knows and appreciate the science of acoustics in theatres. Sound can shatter objects, effectively at least comparatively fragile objects like wine glasses when subjected to the skilled projections of the trained human voice (or equivalent). Nonetheless, for those who crunch the numbers, the energy required to negate gravity is way exterior the realm of which sound power can muster. Considering the cacophony of sounds the human race produces each day, you’d think that all the relevant elements would come collectively someplace, sometime and ‘simply so’ as to provide levitation in one thing, levitation noticed and photographed for the file. Alas, not so.
In some constructions, it’s not just a matter of manipulating massive however irregular stone blocks but fitting them together like a jigsaw puzzle, outcomes which are immediately obvious at sites around the world, like these from the Incan Empire. Precision carving in stone using solely other stone or copper instruments is not easy by any stretch of the imagination. It’s not simple; it is extraordinarily exhausting and time consuming work. Double that when all your blocks aren’t a standard sq. block measurement and shape.
What Do Our Ancestors Say
Pity that though the ancients left all manner of images behind of their daily lives and culture, I find it amazing that regardless of all of those multi-1000’s of images from historic Greece, Rome, Egypt, the Americas, and so forth. not one shows an precise half-finished or partly constructed monument, like a pyramid, or a temple like the Parthenon that’s underneath building, or whatever. That is extremely anomalous IMHO, although there are photos of ancient Egyptians transporting large stone blocks.
Nonetheless, even some of those historic cultures have been puzzled as to how their much more historical ancestors achieved these megalithic ‘missions not possible’.
There’s something very odd when the pure descendents of ‘primitive’ natives resort to tales akin to sci-fi or science-fantasy to account for how their ancestors constructed, transported and erected massive stone monoliths.
Easter Islanders say that their Moai statues walked by themselves from quarry to their final resting (actually standing) place. Who am I to argue with first hand or on-the-spot observations, except Thor Heyerdahl’s “Aku-Aku” crew achieved the same with less elegant however with pure grunt power. Strolling stone statues are just a bit too far into the “Twilight Zone” for comfort. Actually for some motive Easter Islanders in some unspecified time in the future downed their stone tools and abandoned their statue constructions for reasons not entirely clear other than priorities altered. The abandoned unfinished statues can still be seen right this moment, mendacity in place, now long uncared for.
Additionally in the Pacific region, Nan Modal is an ancient city of about 0.Seventy five square kilometres off the coast of the island of Pohnpei in what’s right this moment termed Micronesia. Town is comprised of artificial islands criss-crossed by canals, and thus typically referred to because the Venice of the Pacific. Those ‘islands’ nonetheless are built up of large megalithic stone partitions as much as 25 ft high. How so Effectively the stones have been carried on site on the backs of dragons apparently. To be sincere, that makes as a lot sense as anything else.
I noted above that allegedly sound might levitate massive stone blocks. That concept or commentary is found in each South America and historic Egypt – large stones are someway lifted and transported by sound. I still suppose that is extremely suspect and I think scientists would wish an precise fashionable-day demonstration. I know I’d.
As I noted above, it is not the caving or the transport that is the true subject, nor going from the horizontal to the vertical that is an actual downside, somewhat the problem is lifting massive stones straight up that I particularly puzzle over.
The puzzlement relates to our personal use of stones in building projects. We could I suppose, if we needed to, construct our buildings out of mega-ton blocks of stone. But we don’t. Your home, if it incorporates building stones at all, are stones which are most likely akin to weights of simply several pounds, possibly dozens of pounds; hardly tons.
So do we’ve got a major thriller here Properly yes, particularly when in comparison with modern society as noted immediately above. In our fashionable high-tech age, once we do use stone as a development material, it is in manageable bits and items. We don’t build our houses or office buildings or ballparks or monuments out of multi-ton to multi-hundred ton stone blocks as the ancients did. However when obligation referred to as, like when Abu Simbel had to be relocated to a better elevation when the Aswan Excessive Dam was constructed giving rise to Lake Nasser and the flooding of the historic site, even using fashionable expertise it was still a serious and large effort.
A Potential Resolution
Perhaps we are able to kill two anomalous birds with one hypothetical stone.
Universal One: As we word, from the Americas (Mesoamerica and South America no less than); throughout Europe and the Close to and Middle East, Egypt and different parts of Africa, even unto Asia and the Pacific region, there are ancient megalithic constructions using stone blocks in the multi mega-ton vary. How did the ancients carve, transport, elevate and position such large stone blocks
Universal Two: Also around the world, there’s a common theme of giants, from the Cyclopes in Greco-Roman cultures, to Biblical giants to – well you identify the culture and I am going to guarantee they may have giants as a core aspect of their mythologies. For samplers, here is only a partial record of giants. Effectively there’s Angrboda (Norse), Argos (Greek), Balor (Irish), Biloko (Zaire), Bungisngis (Philippines), the Cyclopes (Greek), Geryon (Greek), the Gigantes (Greek), Goliath (Biblical), Grendel (Anglo-Saxon), the Hecatonchires (Greek), Hrungnir (Norse), Humbaba (Mesopotamia), the Nephilim (Biblical), Skrymir (Norse), Suttung (Norse), Talos (Greek), the Titans (Greek), and Ymir (Norse). Further, you have all method of large trolls and ogres (Scandinavian), varied giant apemen just like the Yeti and Bigfoot/Sasquatch and quite a few others, as nicely because the Giants of Cornwall (led by Gogmagog).
Properly, what’s ‘mission: impossible’ for a young baby, is feasible for an grownup; what’s ‘mission: unimaginable’ for adult people might be potential for a large(s). A large twice as massive as a typical human can have eight times the muscle power, since muscles are 3-D, doubling in length, width and peak; and thusly 2 x 2 x 2 = 8.
What Do Our Ancestors Say Revisited
Ancient Greeks often attributed varied large stone constructions to the Cyclopes, as an example. Such massive buildings are termed the Cyclopean walls since the Cyclopes and solely the Cyclopes might have built these buildings. Perseus had them accountable for constructing the partitions of Mycenae, together with the Lion Gate; Proitos attributed them building the partitions of Tiryns. The medieval Danish historian Saxo Grammaticus cited the Roman ruins as proof that giants must once have walked the Earth. And who built the enormous’s Causeway on the Northern Irish Coast
Is this too far out I’m open to other suggestions, however not less than it would not require high-tech alien assistance, except in fact these worldwide mythological giants, just like the Cyclopes, had been aliens!
Appendix: A couple of notable megalithic monuments.
1) Some unfinished in-situ megaliths.
*Baalbek (Lebanon) has two unfinished stones weighing in at one thousand to 1250 tons apiece.
*There’s an unfinished Egyptian obelisk at Assuan that is all up comes to roughly 1100 tons.
2) Some finished and transported megaliths.
*Stonehenge: some stones are up to forty tons.
*The Avebury stone circle, England, has as its largest stone one over forty tons.
*The famous fortress of Mycenae, Greece has stones close to 100 tons in weight.
*The Parthenon in Athens, Greece has some of its largest stones weighing in at 10 tons.
*Those Easter Island (Rapa Nui to the locals) Moai can weigh as much as 70, even one as much as 86 tons.
*The Colossi of Memnon are two Egyptian statues of Pharaoh Amenhotep III coming in at seven hundred tons every.
*Ramesses II (Ramesses the nice) was not shy about erecting statues to honour himself. Certainly one of his numerous dozens of monumental statues commissioned to picture self (at Luxor) – one hundred tons price of stone. But that is featherweight class.
*Ramesses II was solely simply getting warmed up. There’s a statue at Thebes, Egypt, a part of the Ramessum, the mortuary temple of the pharaoh in question, of 1000 tons. Now that’s heavyweight standing.
*Egyptian obelisks weren’t minuscule. There’s one at 227 tons (Luxor); one at 328 tons (Karnak).
*Nice Pyramid at Giza, Egypt is effectively often called overkill on the subject of constructing a tomb. Though the typical weight of each stone block is ‘only’ 2.5 tons, the biggest slabs comprising the burial chamber, are available at 80 tons.
*Other than the great Pyramid, different Egyptian pyramids, in fact most, if not all different, Egyptian pyramids have some monolithic blocks of over 20 tons, including monolithic roof slabs, plugs and burial vaults, some of which weigh in at over a hundred tons.
South and Central America
*These well known but mysterious Olmec heads in Mesoamerica aren’t trivial works when carved all the way down to some 50 tons all up.
*The Inca city of Machu Picchu, Peru has giant stones half and parcel of its construction weighing in from 20 to 50 tons apeice.
*There’s a really well-known Aztec calendar stone at Tenochtitlan, Mexico that weighs significantly greater than the wall calendar you grasp up at home. Weight, 24 tons.
*Palenque, Mexico is a well-known Mayan site, especially thanks to Erich Von Daniken. The largest stones on site weigh 12 to 15 tons.
Further recommended readings
Childress, David Hatcher; Know-how of the Gods: The Unbelievable Sciences of the Ancients; Adventures Unlimited Press, Kempton, Illinois; 2000:
De Camp, L. Sprague; The Ancient Engineers; Ballantine Books, New York; 1974:
De Camp, L. Sprague & De Camp; Catherine C; Citadels of Thriller; Fontana/Collins, London; 1972:
Hancock, Graham; Fingerprints of the Gods: A Quest for the start and the tip; Mandarin, London; 1996:
Hancock, Graham & Faiia, Santha; Heaven’s Mirror: Quest for the Lost Civilization; Penguin Books, London; 1999:
National Geographic Society; Mysteries of Mankind: Earth’s Unexplained Landmarks; National Geographic Society, Washington, D.C.; 1992:
National Geographic Society; stone island full tracksuit sale Mysteries of the Ancient World; National Geographic Society, Washington, D.C.; 1979:
Von Daniken, Erich; Chariots of the Gods ; Souvenir Press, London; 1969:
Von Daniken, Erich; Gods from Outer Area; Souvenir Press, London; 1970:
NOVA; Secrets of Misplaced Empires; PBS/WGBH, Boston; 2006:
NOVA; Secrets and techniques of Misplaced Empires II; PBS/WGBH, Boston; 2008:
There’s also been dozens of books/movies written/produced particularly concerning the archaeological mysteries of Stonehenge, historical Egyptian monuments including the pyramids, Easter Island, the ruins of Mesoamerica and South America, and so on. Consult your native library.