Feb 28

"..Many people are arrested during investigation, brought before court and some of them are set free. But repeatedly targeting ’some people’ is unfair," Khurshid told reporters on the sidelines of a conference organised by an Urdu news channel. " says the Minister!

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/investigation-in-2006-malegaon-blast-case-unfair-khurshid/752438/

Now, if the Karnataka Enquiry Panel indicts overzealous Missionaries for provoking communal violence, Mr Moiley, the Law Minister objected. Particularly as the Karnataka Govt was ruled by BJP, their adversary, it was convenient to blame the Panel as being subjective to protect right wing elements suspected to have engaged in violence originally!

Now Maharashtra is ruled by Congress itself and their police arrest suspects of whom the Minister finds the arrest of few muslims alone as unfair, as if he knew better than their police (under their own party’s rule as well) about the details of the suspects!

Are the Congress ministers at the centre hell bent to have all police and Enquiry Panels to indict only right wing activists for all violence (that can be linked to BJP, their major opponent and a pro Hindu), to suit their mispropagandas, for sake of minority vote bank?!

Does their acts carry least logic or fair criticism in any of the critical cases, where people’s safety and security are involved? They see more politics and political gain in every public issue. They suspect the objectivity of their officers and Enquiry teams, if it does not indict Hindu outfits, as evident in the ‘loaded’ comments of Kurshid saheb too, isn’t it?

What do you think of this aberration in the Congress team?

Yes,It is common to see more politics and political gain in every public issue.

Feb 26

No doubt yankees will laugh but listen to my argument first.

1) You cant trust the media because they lied about WMD in Iraq, lied about the state of the economy (hence financial crisis) etc… You cant trust them

2) The media claims the US has the most advanced and greatest military in the world. Why is it then that they still haven’t crushed the Taliban. A bunch of guys with WW2 equipment, virtually no training, food, equipment which are still terrorizing and killing US soldiers daily and globally.

3) Paki has had nukes for a while now, no doubt the range has increased. They aren’t oil dependent and were one of the few Muslim states prior to now to acknowledge the legitimacy of the Taliban. Paki also is having trouble controlling the rage and seriously Islamic bias of the people.

4) Paki’s military hasn’t yet suffered any significant defeat or US intervention in it having nuclear capabilities (unlike N.Korea, Iran etc…). No doubt the US knows that its already too late to stop this one. Which makes it more dangerous.

While Iran looks bad, Paki is always on the border of becoming a nuclear fanatic power (they almost did initiate the first atomic war with India not long ago), and are unstable to say the least, with all bias towards Islam. So in these scenearios what could the US do, if anything?

- Paki conquers with allies all major OPEC nations and sinks the warm water port fleet?
- Paki special forces bomb and destroy the white house killing all inside.
- A fleet of 1000 war ships sail undetected across the sea and start shelling Florida?

Interested in your views. Some may seem outrageous but consider just what Paki is, a nuclear armed, non oil dependent, Islam bias, war ready state. And the general BS witnessed recently that the US media pushes out

The only reason that we loose troops is because we are fighting a political war. The Soviets (Russians) only lost because the US was funding, training and equipping them with post WWII and newer weapons. Your right about the media they all have an agenda and speak lies so you have to take news with a farina of salt. The weapons that the afghans are using are post WWII and better variants of the AK. They are the same design as the original AK but not the same. The RPG they are using are new and are using the RPG-7 which is a very modern round that was designed in the 1990’s. The RPK they are using are new 1990’s and newer. America is fighting a political war if we were not everyone in Afghan would be dead if we wanted it that way. The world media and our own media would not like that so that is the only reason it has not happened.

As far a a war with Pakistan that is highly unlikely. With all of our satellites and military around the world there is not much we do not see. We have forces around the world. What do you think the people looking at the satellites do. They watch the worlds forces. Ships not a problem, do they have super carriers? Nope we do 1000 ships one of our fleets fifth fleet would decimate it. As far as the white house you do realize that they have SAM sites on and around those sites?

This is not a serious question. Nukes fired get everyone Else’s nukes fired and everyone dies.

This is the stupidest question I have answered in a while

Feb 26


chupame la polla

Feb 26

i was reading this from an article please read it and tell my what you think

Recent threats from terrorist bin Laden, and growing evidence that "suitcase nukes" are in the hands of terrorist organizations, may indicate the approaching fulfillment of two Our Lady of the Roses prophecies: (1) that Russia plans to invade the United States with "missiles" and (2) a prophetic vision given to Veronica on March 26, 1983 of a nuclear warhead in an abandoned New York City subway tunnel.

Numerous articles on November 10, 2001 indicate that the terrorist bin Laden possesses and is willing to use nuclear weapons against the United States:

Osama bin Laden claims today that he has nuclear weapons and is ready to use them. “We have chemical and nuclear weapons as a deterrent and if America used them against us we reserve the right to use them,” two Pakistani newspapers quote him as saying.
(Bin Laden makes nuclear threat, London Times, November 10, 2001)

Iraq’s Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden are working together on the operational coordination of a potential terrorist nuclear attack on the West, according to DEBKA-Net-Weekly. Hussein ordered his top nuclear scientists to make devices in stock ready for arming earlier this week – the first time this order has ever been issued.
(Bin Laden – Saddam Nuclear Pact?, WorldNetDaily, November 10, 2001)

Osama bin Laden may have already shipped weapons of mass destruction to the U.S. Pakistan’s Frontier Post says the Al-Qaida network has transported nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons there. It claims at least two briefcases containing nuclear weapons may have reached U.S. shores.
(Bin Laden may have shipped nuclear bomb to U.S., November 10, 2001

It is theoretically possible that Russia could launch a successful attack on the US. It would be incredibly gutsy for them to do it, and very risky, but certainly possible. They’d probably need the cooperation of Iran and China as well for it to work though.

It would start with a nuclear weapon hidden in a communications satellite detonating in orbit over Omaha, Nebraska, causing an electromagnetic pulse which would destroy all unshielded electronics in North America. Essentially, every single computer, electrical appliance, radio, television, and anything else would stop working. All radio communication would go dead, so would many communications satellites the US military relies on.

This devastating first strike would be followed by a massive Russian-Chinese attack using Tu-22M bombers carrying cruise missiles to sink American carriers based in Japan and Guam, sinking the much of the American Pacific fleet, perhaps by prefacing cruise missile barrages with high-altitude nuclear detonations to blind anti-missile defenses. Similar Russian attacks on American forces in the North Sea and by the Iranians against the US fleet in the Persian Gulf would probably result in the near annihilation of much of the US navy.

Following that, or perhaps preceding it by a few minutes, charter aircraft carrying Russian Spetsnaz special forces would land in American airports in San Francisco, Seattle, New York, and Washington. They’d quickly overwhelm any resistance from police and secure them, allowing massive airlifts of Russian tanks and airborne forces to arrive in the secured airport. Resistance on the part of the US would be minimized due to lack of effective communications, allowing Russian forces to quickly secure major metropolitan areas. Russian strategic bombers could also use cruise missiles, possibly armed with nuclear weapons to neutralize US missile silos and bases.

By the time communications got restored, the Russians would probably have captured most of the government and built a firm bridgehead in the US. With the US navy hit in coordinated surprise attacks, the Chinese and Russians would be free to bring over their extensive land forces into Seattle and San Francisco. The US would have to either capitulate or respond with nuclear weapons… assuming they’d even be able to authorize a counterattack due to the likely chance that the President would be killed or captured by a Russian thrust against Washington. Meanwhile, much of the US military will have been trapped overseas and unable to return to the US while Russian and Chinese land forces overrun most of the West Coast.

Yes. It’s possible. It also requires unprecedented amounts of nerve to pull off successfully.

Feb 26

PAKHTUNISTANZINDABADhttp://gdata.youtube.com/feeds/api/users/pakhtunistanzindabadPeopleAFGHANISTAN, PAKTIKA, PAKTIA, HELMAND, KABUL, HERAT, KANDUZ, QANDAHAR, Quetta, TALIBAN, PASHTON, NEW, VIDEO, 2011, ATTAN, IN, AMRICA, Pashto, Nath, Nasheed, AFGHAN, MUJAHID, SHAHDAT, PAKISTAN, PAKHUNISTANZINDABAD, LAGHMAN, GHAZANI, CHAMAN, WAZIRISTANAFGHANISTAN TALIBAN JUNG

Duration : 0:4:25

Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

« Previous Entries

>